Prof. Pawlotsky: We released the EASL Recommendations on the Treatment of Hepatitis C 2018 at the beginning of this International Liver Congress meeting. I think the most important new recommendations are for pan-genotypic drug regimens. We currently have two very efficient, safe and well-tolerated pan-genotypic regimens - sofosbuvir and velpatasvir, and glecaprevir and pibrentasvir. Both of these are recommended for different durations for patients infected with all HCV genotypes. The two regimens can be used for genotypes 1 through 6. Another very important new inclusion in the Guideline is that we offer the opportunity for simplified therapy with the goal of improved access to care. Simplified therapy means there is minimal pretreatment assessment. The severity of liver disease should be assessed using a very simple method, APRI or FIB-4. Viral replication should be confirmed. Then there is no need to do genotyping and the patient is treated either with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir for 12 weeks, or with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir for 8 weeks in non-cirrhotics or 12 weeks in cirrhotics. SVR should be assessed and that completes therapy. It is a very simplified approach and is a major breakthrough in these EASL Guidelines that will improve access to care.
Prof. Pawlotsky: There are very few difficult-to-treat patients right now. Our treatments are improving. We achieve high SVR rates in a vast majority of the population. The patients with genotype 3 and cirrhosis are slightly more difficult to treat. They still need either longer therapy or the addition of a third drug. That is the reason why it is recommended to treat these patients for 12 weeks with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir if they are treatment na?ve and 16 weeks if they are treatment experienced, or treat them with the triple combination of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir. With this therapeutic approach, SVR rates are very high. Patients with decompensated cirrhosis still have an indication for sofosbuvir/velpatasvir plus ribavirin (the only group which will use ribavirin). But overall, solutions have been provided for many of the difficult-to-treat patient populations, and most patients are relatively easy to treat with very high SVR rates.
Prof. Pawlotsky: No, I don’t think we will need HCV vaccines in the future. It would obviously be very nice to have an HCV vaccine, but the problem with that is it is very difficult to make technically and scientifically, and we can probably handle the problem of hepatitis C with the new treatments. The challenge now is not to find a vaccine, but to find the patients and provide them with good access to care.
Prof. Pawlotsky: There are two major challenges. The first challenge is to screen and identify all the patients who are infected with HCV. The second challenge is linkage to care - making sure patients who have been diagnosed with HCV infection have access to efficient therapy. I believe that with the new drugs that are now on the market and the pan-genotypic regimens, glecaprevir/pibrentasvir and sofosbuvir/velpatasvir, it will be possible to cure the vast majority of patients. Again, it is important that screening is done, and that patients have linkage to care so that they receive therapy.